The Argument Of God s Existence - 1737 Words

BEST EXPLANATION Does God exist? This question has been in debate for centuries with many opposing views, some arising from philosophers on the same side while others refute Gods existence altogether. However for this particular paper I will be taking the best explanations approach. What I mean by this is I do not have proof of God’s existence but the existence of God is the best explanation for the universe around me. With this statement in mind we will discuss arguments in support of God’s existence as well as philosopher H.J McCloskey’s article On Being an Atheist. Within McCloskey’s article he refers to three well known theist arguments as proofs the cosmological, teleological and argument from design. The Cosmological argument†¦show more content†¦In order for a universe filled with creation, to be formed by anything other than an all-powerful being, is to say that you or I could construct the same creation. Some theorist believe the Big Bang Theory but this would constitute taking time, space and chance and exploding that into everything while subtracting your law of casualty (Wellman, 2012). Also if the universe had just exploded into the state of â€Å"being† then what was it before a â€Å"non-being† (Wellman, 2012)? The Big Bang Theory is lacking what the cosmological argument provides something had to exist you cannot just have existence from nothing. Therefore our universe in order to exist supports the existence of the uncaused all-powerful being. McCloskey’s statement in his article On Being an Atheist â€Å"to get the proof going, genuine indisputable example of design and purpose are needed.† In order for something to be indisputable you have to be beyond question and without a doubt. Theory is not claiming or making the statement that it’s a proven fact. Different from scientific evidence which is fact based. Some of the opposing theories such as Evolution or Big Bang Theory attempt to use science as proof. Although there is no scientific evidence to support these claims again leaving it to theory. No sufficient defeaters have been presented to debunk so to speak the arguments in which we are discussingShow MoreRelatedThe Argument For God s Existence And Nature2146 Words   |  9 Pagesthe orthodox Christian, confronts Philo’s skepticism towards the arguments for God’s existence and nature that have thus far be discussed. Deamea presents a version of the ontological argument that he believes should provide undeniable proof of the truths found in religious dogma. However, Philo is not convinced with this argument because of the nature of the argument. Philo describes Deamea’s ontological argument as an a priori argument. In Latin a priori is means â€Å"from before† but when this termRead MoreDescartes Argument For God s Existence Of God Essay1103 Words   |  5 Pages In this paper, I offer a reconstruction of Descartes argument for God’s existence in the Third Meditation. Descartes tries to prove the existence of God with an argument that proceeds from the clear and distinct idea of an infinite being to the existence of himself. He believes that his clear and distinct idea of an infinite being with infinite â€Å"objective reality† leads to the occurrence of the â€Å"Special Causal Principle†. I will start by discussing and analyzing Descartes clear and distinct ideaRead MoreAnselm s Argument On The Existence Of God934 Words   |  4 PagesThe existence of God is a question everyone asks himself or herself at one point or another. It is always being questioned. In many ways God can be proven to exist by logical arguments and many of these arguments can be disprov ed by a similar logic. The most compelling of the proofs that I have read is Anselm’s Ontological Argument. This argument in many ways has goods points about the conceptuality of truth, ideas, thought and how that translates to reality, but is written by someone who alreadyRead MoreA Logical Argument For God s Existence Or Nonexistence1471 Words   |  6 PagesA logical argument for God’s existence or nonexistence is the cosmological argument. William Craig says in his book that there are three statements that give the cosmological argument form. Craig concluded that whatever begins to exist has a cause. The Universe began to exist therefore the Universe had a cause. What that cause was, is widely challenged. The argument against the existence of God includes the Big Bang Theory. The Big Bang Model is a broadly accepted theory for the beginning and evolutionRead MoreKant And Anselm : Argument For God s Existence1142 Words   |  5 PagesYourFirstName YourLastNameâ⠂¬ ¨Instructor s Name†¨Course Title†¨21 November 2016 Any Topic (Writer s Choice) Kant and Anselm: The Argument for God’s Existence Philosophers have for long debated on the existence of a Supreme all powerful and all perfect God, Kant, and Anselm being among them. Where Anselm has supported the presence of God and all the attributes that regard to the Him, Kant has risen up with a counter argument. The interaction between the two, the philosophical objection raised by KantRead MoreDescartes s Argument On The Existence Of God1834 Words   |  8 PagesDiscourse on the Method, Descartes attempted to prove the existence of God in a priori manner. He did not trust his own senses when trying to prove the existence of God and therefore he relied on the ontological argument. By making the same assumption made by Anselm, which was that an ontological argument assumes that existence is a predicate of God, Descartes is able to conclude that ‘God exists’ is true by definition because the subject ‘God’, who already contains all perfections, already containsRead MoreAnselm s Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God935 Words   |  4 PagesAnselm’s Ontological argument sets out to not only prove God’s existence, but to show that God’s existence is self-evident. Similar to other ontological arguments, it uses a priori knowledge to argue its validity, meaning that the propositions made are derived from internal reasoning instead of sense experience. The argument begins with Anselm defining the term God as â€Å"that, than which nothing greater can be conceived† (pg.26). Although simple, once this term is accepted Anselm believes he has successfullyRead MoreKant And Anselm : Argument For God s Existence1129 Words   |  5 PagesKant and Anselm: The Argument for God’s Existence Philosophers have for long debated on the existence of a Supreme all powerful and all perfect God, Kant, and Anselm being among them. Where Anselm has supported the presence of God and all the attributes that regard to the Him, Kant has risen up with a counter argument. The interaction between the two, the philosophical objection raised by Kant, and what this means to the rest of mankind will be analyzed in this paper. To begin with, Anselm introducesRead MoreClarke s Cosmological Argument On The Existence Of God1648 Words   |  7 Pages Clarke’s Cosmological argument has been around for multiple centuries—the purpose of this argument being to try to prove the existence of God. Although this argument sounds valid—meaning that â€Å"IF premises 1 and 2 are true, then the conclusion must be true† — while many people have accepted this argument, it has also caused a lot of questioning and skepticism, mainly because of what the Cosmological Argument uses to support its argument—the Principle of Sufficient reason. Before determining whetherRead MoreValidity And Effectiveness Of Anselm s Ontological Argument On The Existence Of God1095 Words   |  5 PagesAnselm s Ontological Argument on the existence of God. I will begin by presenting Anselm’s Ontological Argument from the ground up. This includes the argument, basic idea, initial assumptions, Anselm’s definition of god, and Anselm s distinctions which are needed to completely understand the nature of my argument. Furthermore, I will present concepts of logic and define what makes an argument valid, and circular argument because they are necessary for understanding the validity of this argument. Following

Zhengrong To Ruixiang The Medieval Chinese Reception Of...

Sun-ah Choi examines the unusual iconography of the Chinese Buddha, which is represented by the Buddhas found in Sichuan Province, China, in her essay published in Art Bulletin (97:4), Zhengrong to Ruixiang: The Medieval Chinese Reception of the Mahabodhi Buddha Satua. The images of Chinese Buddha experienced a notable change in the seventh century. Before the seventh century, the imageries focused on the narratives scenes and the Buddhas, at the same time, were devoid of the lavish jewelry. Since then, as the puti ruixiang cave displays in Sichuan, the Buddha images are regarded as independent icons with heavy ornamentation. Immediately, Choi questions the origins of the name and then sets forth her thesis. In this article, she†¦show more content†¦On the contrary, to some extent, the sadness of Yijing converts into some positive feelings. From then on, for human beings, the statue of the Buddha is identical to his physical body, connecting the past, the present, and the fu ture, delivering his benevolence to the mortals. Thus, this results in a significant shift from â€Å"as if real† to â€Å"the true visage.† When Choi rethinks the notion of the replications, first, she adduces a concept from John Ma, who points out the peculiarity of people in ancient or medieval period. They prefer to illustrate their characteristic subjects, instead of producing identical replications. At the same time, she uses a considerable amount of pictures to elaborate the different imitations of the Buddhas in different cultural circumstances. For instance, the Buddha that was built in South Korea is recognized by its significant size. The measurements of each part of this Buddha are identical to the earlier prototype. In Indonesia, there is another statue known for its crude quality, because according to the legend, the prototype was unfinished. Different from the imitation of size or unusual quality, the puti ruixiang Buddha in China emphasizes on its heavy decorations consciously since the Buddha in the Mahabodhi Temple was decorated with lavish ornaments. These visual images help the viewer to distinguish the stylistic differences among the characteristic Buddhas. Based on the

Due Diligence free essay sample

â€Å"Due diligence† simply means taking all reasonable care to protect the well-being of employees or co-workers. It is the opposite of negligence. To meet the standard of due diligence, you must take all precautions that are reasonable in the circumstances so that you can carry out your work and your health and safety responsibilities. The single most frequent cause of accidents in the workplace is failing to take the time to think through the work, identify the hazards and deal with them. Due diligence is a legal defence for a person(s) charged under occupational health and safety legislation. In defence, if the employer can prove that all reasonable precautions were taken in the circumstances, they may be found not guilty. As an employer, you aren’t expected to anticipate and prevent all possible accidents. However, you must take all the precautions that a reasonable and prudent person would take in the circumstances. We will write a custom essay sample on Due Diligence or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If an employer has all the OHS program elements required by the Occupational Health and Safety Regulation in effect and working well, they will generally be acting in due diligence. The employer also has to take special steps to control specific hazards in order to show that they are exercising due diligence in particular circumstances. The greater the risk, the greater the need for specific policies, practices and other measures to control the hazard. To prove due diligence, the employer must show that an appropriate program was in place and that several criteria were established: 1. All OHS policies, practices and procedures must be written and outlined. This would ensure that the employer is demonstrating workplace safety audits, identifying hazardous practices and conditions and have made necessary changes to correct these conditions. 2. Appropriate training and education must be provided to employees so they understand and carry out their work according to all established policies, practices and procedures. 3. Supervisors must be trained so they are competent in the OHS program 4. The workplace must be monitored to ensure all employees are following policies, practice and procedures. Breaches of safety rules must be documented and follow a progressive discipline guideline. 5. Workers must also be responsible to ensure the safety of themselves and their coworkers (a duty of care). This includes following safe work practices and complying with regulations. 6. Employees should be encouraged to report â€Å"near misses† and the employer should investigate all incidents and update any OHS information as needed. 7. All of the above steps should be documented so show how the company’s OHS program has progressed over time. This up-to-date information will aid in the employers defence of proving due diligence. Due diligence is demonstrated by your actions before an event occurs, not after. That is, it is proactive, not reactive. Since an ongoing Occupational Health and Safety program within the company forms the basis of due diligence, it is important to have proper documentation of any rules, regulations, activities and improvements within the program. However, this alone won’t amount to due diligence unless you can prove that you have implemented it. It’s pointless to have a mountain of rules and procedures if none of them are being understood and adhered to by the employees. It’s extremely important to document any reported incidents and the steps that were taken to control or eliminate the hazard and it’s just as important to show that employees have been provided adequate training and supervision to work safely. There is great emphasis on what is considered â€Å"reasonable† because of the difficulty of defining the word. Nowhere in the OHS law does it define what the reasonable steps that an employer was supposed to have taken to prove due diligence. What one person may think is reasonable, another may not. The courts have a set of guidelines that they follow to determine whether the accused was â€Å"reasonable† in their actions: The knowledge and experience of the people involved The nature of the work to be done The likelihood and degree of potential harm Each person’s degree of control (ability to prevent) and; Whether there was a safer alternative Along with these guidelines, the courts must make a decision of the specific circumstance by looking at past cases in which a due diligence defence was raised and see why they won or lost and apply the same rules to compare all situations.

Thoughts On Pocahontas The Movie Essays - Disneys Pocahontas

Thoughts on Pocahontas the Movie After watching the disney movie, Pocahontas, many people have found a large amount of historical inaccuracies in both the setting, and the characters portrayed. An example is: the topographic features of Virginia arent at all like the waterfalls and mountains shown in the movie. Other examples include the fact that Pocahontas and John Smith never actually fell in love, that Powhatan never actually intended to kill John Smith, and that Pocahontas was told to put her head between Smith and the executioners. But these are just minor details needed to form an opinion on the issue. One must take a step back, try to look at the big picture, get a feel for the importance of these details, and track down the real reason behind the making of Pocahontas. The truth is, this movie was definitely geared to a younger audience. It was made for enjoyment purposes, for the formation of role-models in youngsters minds, and to establish a difference between wrong and right. Maybe even to break down some stereotypes about native americans that might lead to future uneducated social injustices. It is not a documentary meant to be shown in an elementary social studies class to help students learn historical information. The issue at hand is whether or not Hollywood has the responsibility to portray history accurately. And the definite answer is No!. Hollywood films are made for the purpose of entertainment: something to do on a Saturday night. If they were meant to be educational films, you wouldnt go to Blockbuster to get them, you would go to the library, and every film would come with a pretty little guarantee on the box that says, ALL THE INFORMATION ON THE ENCLOSED VIDEO TAPE HAS BEEN RESEARCHED EXTENSIVELY, AND IS GUARANTEED TO BE 100% HISTORICALLY ACCURATE.